UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIPS FOR INNOVATION: SRI LANKAN EXPERIENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26458/1811Keywords:
Innovation, University-Industry Relationships, NIS, Networking, Sri LankaAbstract
The University sector in the national innovation system (NIS) is considered as one of the key players which links new knowledge with the industry for the purpose of diffusing new knowledge for economic and social benefits through commercialization of products, services, processes and other artifacts. This paper inquires the role of Sri Lankan universities in the innovation process by paying special attention on the strength of university-industry linkages. Responses from the industrial sector obtained through a surveys and interviews with respondents. Data presented and analyzed through descriptive statistics using summery statistics and figures. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was employed to determine the strength of the networking relationship among the Universities and the Firms Qualitative data were analyzed employing the method of content analysis. The study revealed a positive trend in the higher education sector towards performing effective role in the future towards innovation. However, it was evident that these relationships are still remained very weak. The industrial sector remains inward oriented with little intention to innovation while universities still prioritize their traditional teaching role in higher education.References
Chesbrough, H.W., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2006).
Cohen, L. R. & Noll, R. G., “Privatizing Public Research”, Scientific American, (1994): 271- 273.
De Silva, L. R., Uyarra, E. & Oakey, R., “Academic Entrepreneurship in a Resource-Constrained Environment: Diversification and Synergistic Effects”, Technology Transfer in a Global Economy (2012):73-97.
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L., “The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations”, Research Policy, 29 (2000): 109-123.
Feinson, S., National Innovation Systems Overview and Country Cases. Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science and Technology Policies in Development, (2003): 13–38.
Fleming, L. & Sorenson, O., “Science as a Map in Technological Search”, Strategic Management Journal, 25(8‐9) (2004): 909-928.
Freeman, C., Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, (London, Frances Pinter, 1987).
Galli, R. & Tuebal, M., Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems (1st ed.), (1997), http://ifise.unipv.it/Publications/Paradigmatic.pdf, Accessed July 05, 2015.
Geuna, A. & Muscio, A., “The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature”. Minerva, 47(1) (2009): 93-114.
Hargadon, A., “Brokering Knowledge: Linking Learning and Innovation”, Research in Organizational behavior (1st ed.), 24 (2002): 41-85.
Intarakumnerd, P. & Virasa, T., “Broader Roles of RTOs in Developing Countries: From Knowledge- Creators to Strengtheners of National Innovation System” (2002), http://www.cid.harvard.edu/ archive/biotech/events/sti_conf/intarakumnerd200902.pdf, Accessed January 05, 2015.
Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R. & Winter, S., “On the Sources and Significance of Inter-Industry Differences in Technological Opportunities”, Research Policy, 1st ed., (1995): 185-205.
Lundvall, B., “User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization”, National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (1st ed.), (1992): 45-67.
Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol. 2), (Anthem Press, 2010).
Munari, F., & Toschi, L., “Do Venture Capitalists Have a Bias Against Investment in Academic Spin-offs? Evidence from the Micro and Nanotechnology Sector in the UK”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), (2011): 397-432.
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, (Oxford University Press, 1993).
OECD, National Innovation Systems, (Paris,1997).
Perkmann, M. & Walsh, K., “University–Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), (2007): 259-280.
Rosenberg, N., “Why Do Firms Do Basic Research (with their own money)?”. Research policy, 19(2), 165-174.
Scott, J., “Social network analysis”, Sociology, 22(1) (1988):109-127.
University Grant Commission, University Statistics Book, (published by UGC Sri Lanka 2015).
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. & Zimmermann, E. “Combining Entrepreneurial and Scientific Performance in Academia: Towards a Compounded and Reciprocal Matthew-effect?”, Research Policy, 33(3) (2004): 425-441.
