Some strategies for improving the accuracy of unemployment rate forcasts in România
Keywords:
forecasts, predictions, accuracy, multi-criteria ranking, combined forecasts, Hodrick-Prescott filter, Holt-Winters smoothing exponential techniqueAbstract
This study proposed to evaluate some alternative forecasts for the unemployment rate of Romania made by European Commission and two national institutions: National Commission for Prognosis (NCP) and Institute for Economic Forecasting (IEF). The most accurate predictions on the forecasting horizon 2001-2011 were provided by IEF and the less accurate by NCP. These results were obtained using U1 Theil’s statistic and a new method that has not been used before in literature in this context. The multi-criteria ranking was applied to make a hierarchy of the institutions regarding the accuracy and five important accuracy measures were taken into account at the same time: mean errors, mean squared error, root mean squared error, U1 and U2 statistics of Theil. The combined forecasts of institutions’ predictions are the best strategy to improve the forecasts accuracy. The filtered and smoothed original predictions based on Hodrick-Prescott filter, respectively Holt-Winters technique are a good strategy of improving the accuracy only for NCP expectations. The assessment and improvement of forecasts accuracy have an important contribution in growing the quality of the decisional process.References
Abreu, I., International Organisations’ vs. Private Analysts’ Forecasts: An Evaluation, Banco de Portugal, article available at: http://www.bportugal.pt/ enUS/BdP%20Publications%20Research/wp201120.pdf, 2011.
Allan, G., Evaluating the Usefulness of Forecasts of Relative Growth, Strathclyde, “Discussion Papers in Economics”, No. 12-14, 2012.
Armstrong, J.S. and Fildes, R., On the Selection of Error Measures for Comparisons among Forecasting Methods, “Journal of Forecasting”, 14, p. 67-71, 1995.
Bates, J. and Granger, C.W.J., The Combination of Forecasts, “Operations Research Quarterly”, 20(4), 451-468, 1969.
Bratu (Simionescu), Mihaela, Filters or Holt Winters Technique to Improve the Forecasts for USA Inflation Rate?, “Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica”, Vol. 9, issue no. 1/2013 (forthcoming), 2013.
Bratu, M., Strategies to Improve the Accuracy of Macroeconomic Forecasts in USA, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN-10: 3848403196, ISBN-13: 978-3848403196, 2012.
Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R., Comparing Predictive Accuracy, “Journal of Business and Economic Statistics”, 13, p. 253-265, 1995.
Dovern, J. and Weisser, J., Accuracy, Unbiasedness and Efficiency of Professional Macroeconomic Forecasts: An Empirical Comparison for the G7, “International Journal of Forecasting”, 27 (2), p. 452-465, 2011.
Franses, P.H.; McAleer, M. and Legerstee, R., Evaluating Macroeconomic Forecasts: A Concise Review of Some Recent Developments, Working paper/Department of Economics and Finance, University of Canterbury, 2012.
Gorr, W.L., Forecast Accuracy Measures for Exception Reporting Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves, “International Journal of Forecasting”, Volume 25, Issue 1, January-March 2009, p. 48-61, 2009.
Heilemann, U. and Stekler, H., Introduction to the Future of Macroeconomic Forecasting, “International Journal of Forecasting”, 23(2), p. 159-165, 2007.
Ruth, K., Macroeconomic Forecasting in the EMU: Does Disaggregate Modeling Improve Forecast Accuracy?, “Journal of Policy Modelling”, Volume 30, Issue 3, May-June 2008, p. 417-429, 2008.
