Contractual liability
Keywords:
contractual liability, damages, prejudice, wrongful act, default, assessmentAbstract
Any obligation entitles the creditor to claim the debtor to fulfil accordingly the performance he is bound to. An improper or delayed performance or the failure to perform by one party causes the other a prejudice, therefore entitling the latter to claim the former damages equivalent to the prejudice suffered.References
Chivu, Gheorghe. "Discussions about the Legal Interest, in light of New Regulations." Law Journal no.5 (1999): 44-49; Ţuca, A. Iuliana. "Legal Regime of Interest in the Loan Agreement, in light of the New Regulations contained in Ordinance of the Government no. 9/ 2000. Juridica Journal no.6 (2000): 28-31; Popescu, C. Liviu. "Establishment of Legal Interest Level. in light of the Regulations of Ordinance of the Government no. 9/ 2000, approved with amendments by Law no.365/ 2002 and Law no. 422/ 2002." Law Journal no.10 (2002): 3-16.
Ciutacu, Florin, and Cristian Jora, Civil Law. The General Theory of Obligations. Bucharest:Themis Cart, 2003. p. 385-386.
Corhan, Adriana. Compensation by Cash Equivalent. Bucharest: Lumina Lex,1999. p. 73-80.
Eliescu, Mihail. Tort Liability. Bucharest: The Romanian Academy, 1972. p. 7.; Albu, Ioan. Civil Law. The Contract and Civil Liability. Cluj-Napoca: Dacia, 1994, p. 235.;
Law no. 356/ 2002 for the approval of Ordinance of the Government no. 9/ 2000 on the Legal Interest for Financial Obligations, published in The Official Journal of Romania no. 425 of 18 June 2002.
Liviu. Treaty of Civil Law. The Obligations, 1st. vol., “The General Legal Regime”. Bucharest: CH Beck, 2006, p. 339.
Ordinance of the Government no. 9 / 2000 on the Legal Interest for Financial Obligations, published in The Official Journal of Romania no. 26 of 25 January 2000.
Pop, Liviu. work cited. p.348; Toma, Mircea. Civil Law. The General Theory of Obligations. Bucharest: Argument, 2000. p.347. Filipescu, P. Ion, and Andrei I. Filipescu. Work Cited. p.206; Stătescu, Constantin, and Corneliu Bîrsan. Work Cited. p.357; Dogaru, Ion, and Pompil Drăghici. Civil Law. The General Theory of Obligations. Bucharest: All Beck, 2002. p. 455; Ciutacu, Florin, and Cristian Jora, work cited. p.388.
Stătescu, Constantin, and Cornelius Bîrsan, Civil Law. The General Theory of Obligations. Bucharest: All Beck, 2002. p. 349.
“The Supreme Court, Civil Section, Decision no. 625/ 14.03.1984”, in Ioan Mihuţ. Repertory of Practice in Civil Matters of the Supreme Court and other Courts for the Years 1980-1985. Bucharest: Scientific and Encyclopedic Publ.,1986. p.82.
”The Court of Appeal of Bucharest, the 4th.Civil Section, Civil Decision no. 3154/ 1999.” Collection of Legal Practice (1999): 43.
