RETHINKING PERSUASION IN RELIGIOUS SYMBOLIC COMMUNICATION: A MARKETING POINT OF VIEW

Ciprian Adrian GHINEA

Abstract


The marketing dynamics of the study and praxis of persuasion present different interweavings with the time frame chosen. Even so, we consider that the only one offering a stable reference background is religious communication, because even if interpretations may differ, the basic principles of association towards individual apprehension and comprehension remain the same. It is the author intention to try to map out possible connections between persuasion, as a symbolic process, and religious symbolic communication, by assuming that, in a Biblical sense, communication is intrinsic to the act of being of all humanity.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allott, R. The Great Mosaic Eye: Embodied Language Evolution and Society. Xlibris Corporation, 2012.

Andersen, K. E. Persuasion: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1971.

Bakar, A., Lee, R., & Rungie, C. (2013). “The effects of religious symbols in product packaging on Muslim consumer responses.” Australasian Marketing Journal, 21(3), 198-204.

Becker, U. The Continuum Encyclopaedia of Symbols. A&C Black, 2000.

Bettinghaus, E. P., & Cody, M. J. Persuasive communication (5th ed). Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/44810144, 1994.

Cobb, J. B. Back To Darwin: A Richer Account of Evolution. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2008.

Epure, M., Eisenstat, E., & Dinu, C. (2014). “Semiotics and persuasion in marketing communication.” Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 13, 592.

Faber, R. (2019). The Ocean of God: On the Transreligious Future of Religions. Anthem Press.

Gârdan, D.A., Epuran, G., Gârdan, I.P. (2016). “Creating value within consumption culture, Studies and scientific researches.” Economics Edition, 24, 45-58.

Gârdan, D., & Geangu, P. I. (2013). “Peculiarities of marketing communications in cultural marketing.” Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 13(3), 78-84.

Hill, E., & Rotelle, J. E. The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century. Brooklyn, N.Y: New City Press, 1990.

John. (n.d.). Sfânta Evanghelie după Ioan: Capitolul 1. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://www.bibliaortodoxa.ro/noul-testament/35/Ioan

Lannon, J. (1994). “Mosaics of Meaning: Anthropology and Marketing.” Journal of Brand Management, 2(3), 155–168.

Lumpkins, C. Y. (2010). “Sacred symbols as a peripheral cue in health advertisements: An assessment of using religion to appeal to African American women about breast cancer screening.” Journal of Media and Religion, 9(4), 181-201.

Miles, C. (2013). “Persuasion, marketing communication, and the metaphor of magic.” European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 2002–2019.

Moritz, K., & Goldammer, A. (2018). “Religious symbolism and iconography.” In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/religious-symbolism

O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). “Persuasion and social influence.” The International Encyclopaedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, 1–19.

O’Shaugnessy, J., & O’Shaughnessy, N. Persuasion in Advertising. Routledge, 2003.

Perloff, R. M. The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century, 4th edition. Routledge, 2010.

Pleizier, T. Religious Involvement in Hearing Sermons: A Grounded Theory Study in Empirical Theology and Homiletics. Eburon Uitgeverij B.V., 2010.

Smith, M. J. Persuasion and Human Action: A Review and Critique of Social Influence Theories. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1982.

Turner, B. S. (2008). “Religious speech: The ineffable nature of religious communication in the information age.” Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8), 219-235.

Viladesau, R. The Beauty of the Cross: The Passion of Christ in Theology and the Arts from the Catacombs to the Eve of the Renaissance. Oxford University Press, USA, 2006.

Whalen, D. J. I See What You Mean: Persuasive Business Communication. Sage, 1996.

Whitehead, A. N. Adventures of Ideas. CUP Archive, 1942.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26458/1936

Copyright (c) 2019 Ciprian Adrian GHINEA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


As to respect GDPR, this site do not allow free registation. Please contact us at: ashues@spiruharet.ro

GDPR Policy:

Please read the statement below:
Processing of personal data and free movement of these data

Registering with this site the author agree with the collection, processing and use of his personal data, exclusively within the ASHUES journal.


 

AWARDS 

WILL BE CONFERRED AT THE END OF THE YEAR

To crown and encourage research efforts of the authors, at the end of a year of publishing our journal board will award online the best papers by distinctions:

1. Best Original Paper Award -  for the paper that has brought something completely new in the reader's attention (a new concept, a new trend, a new proposal in research, etc.)

2. Excellence Award - for the most cited paper and visualized in the online environment during the year

3. First, Second and Third Award- for the best documented and substantiated papers during the year

4. Special Award - to award PhD students and postdocs for the most well documented and substantiated paper


Administred:Rocsana B. Manea Tonis

http://icourses.wix.com/itmk