Development and efficiency of banking and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe

Marijana ĆURAK


In an endogenous growth framework, well developed and efficient financial system can promote economic growth. A number of empirical studies confirmed this hypothesis. Since the financial systems of transition countries are dominated by banks, in this paper we analyze the importance of banking industry for economic growth using methods of panel data analysis for 15 Central and Eastern European countries in the period from 1992 to 2006.

Using variables that measure both quantitative and qualitative aspects of financial intermediation, our findings support the view that the effectiveness of banking industry is more important than its size per se for the economic growth in the Central and Eastern European countries.



banking, financial intermediation, endogenous growth, panel, Central and Eastern Europe

Full Text:



• Ang J. B., 2008. A survey of recent developments in the literature of finance and growth, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22 (3), 536-576.

• Backe P. and Zumer T., 2005. Developments in Credit to the Private Sector in Central and Eastern European EU Member States: Emerging from Financial Repression – A Comparative Overview, Focus on Transition, 2/2005, 83-109.

• Bencivenga V. R. and Smith B. D., 1991. Financial intermediation and endogenous growth, The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 195-209.

• Coricelli F., Mucci F. and Revvoltella, 2006. Household credit in the new Europe: Lending boom or sustainable growth?, CERP Discussion Paper 5520

• Duenwald C., Gueorguiev N. and Schaechter A., 2005. Too much of a good thing? Credit booms in transition economies: The cases of Bulgaria, Romania and Ukraine, IMF Working Paper, 05/128.

• EBRD, 2006. Finance in transition, Transition report 2006

• EBRD, 2008. Growth in transition, Transition report 2008

• Fink G., Haiss P. and Vukšić G., 2008. Contribution of financial market segments at different stages of development: Transition, cohesion and mature economies compared, Journal of Financial Stability, forthcoming.

• Koivu T., 2002. Do efficient banking sectors accelerate growth in transition countries?, BOFIT Discussion Paper, No. 14.

• Kraft E., 2006. Household Lending in Croatia: A Comparative Perspective, the 12th Dubrovnik Economic Conference (DEC), Croatian National Bank

• Levine R., 1997. Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda, Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (2), 688-726.

• Thiel M., 2001. Finance and Growth – a review of theory and available evidence, European Commission Working paper No. 158.

• Wachtel P., 2001. Growth and Finance: what do we know and how do we know it?, International Finance, 4 (3), 335- 362.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2010 author

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




To crown and encourage research efforts of the authors, at the end of a year of publishing our journal board will award online the best papers by distinctions:

1. Best Original Paper Award -  for the paper that has brought something completely new in the reader's attention (a new concept, a new trend, a new proposal in research, etc.)

2. Excellence Award - for the most cited paper and visualized in the online environment during the year

3. First, Second and Third Award- for the best documented and substantiated papers during the year

4. Special Award - to award PhD students and postdocs for the most well documented and substantiated paper

Administred:Rocsana B. Manea Tonis