The object of the assessment – part of the teachers’ evaluation

Robert Gabriel DRAGOMIR, Daliana Ecaterina TASCOVICI



The present paper is part of an ample research on a teacher assessment model in the pre university education system. The purpose was to establish the theoretical aspects of the assessment object taken into consideration. Thus, I have presented and described the assessment object, which involves the teacher’s performance, the content and the result of the teacher’s activity, which is materialized in the pupil’s knowledge.



assessment, teacher, object of the evaluation, competences, attitudinal aspects

Full Text:



• Belous V., Inventica, Asachi Publishing House, 1999, Iassy, p. 99.

• Bernard H., Fontaine F., Quelques éléments d’information pour faciliter la mise en ouevre du guide de l’enseigment. 2 partie: l’évaluation de l’enseignement-cours par les pairs, Universite de Montreal, Service pedagogiwue, 1988, 32 p.

• Braskamp L.A., Brandemburg D.C., Ory J.C., Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 5, nr. 1, 1980.

• Branskamp L.A., Ory J.C., Pieper D.M., Student Written Comments: Dimensions of Instructional Quality. “Journal of Education Psychology”, 1981, n. 73.

• Donald J.G., Criteria for Evaluating University Teaching. Proceeding of the Conference on the Evaluation and Improvement of University Teaching: The Canadian Experience, Montebello Quebec, 1983.

• Feldman K.A., The Association between Student Ratings of Specific Instructional Dimensions and Student Achievement: Refining and Extending the Synthesis of data From Multisection Validity Studies, “Research in Higher Education”, vol. 30, n. 6, 1988.

• French-Lazovic G., Peer Review: Documentary Evidence in the Evaluation of Teaching, “Handbook of Teacher Evaluation”. Red. Jason Millman, California, Sage Publications, National Council on Measurement in Education, 1981.

• Leconte-Beauport M.F., Integration des savoirs, des savoirs-faire et des savoirs-etre par le biais des reprezentations formateurs dans la relation educative, Mésure et évaluation en éducation, vol. 18 (1), 1995.

• Leinhard G., Novice and Expert Knowledge of Individual Students’ Achievement, “Educational Psychology”, 18 (3),1983.

• Lisievici P., Evaluarea în învăţământ. Teorie, practică, instrumente, Aramis Publishing House, Bucharest, 2002, 304 p.

• Miclea M., Oprea D., Evaluarea academică, Cluj-Napoca, 2002, 89 p.

• Mitrofan N., Aptitudinea pedagogică, EDP, Bucharest, 1988.

• Musgrave P.W., Profesorul – obiect al sociologiei învăţământului, în vol. „Sociologia educaţiei şi învăţământului”, EDP, Bucharest, 1977, coordonator Fred Mahler, 372 p.

• Pavelcu V., Problema notei şcolare, în “Vremea şcolii”, nr. 1-2, 1938.

• Platon Carolina, Evaluarea calităţii în învăţământul universitar, Universitatea de Stat din Moldova, Chişinău, 2005, 274 p.

• Ropo E., Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching and Teaching Behaviour: Some Differences between Expert and Novice Teachers. Article presented at the Annual Congress of the American Association for Educational Research,Washington, 1987.

• Shulman L., Ways of Seeing, Ways of Knowing, Ways of Teaching, Ways of Learning about Teaching, “Journal of Curriculum Studies”, nr. 28, Sept.-Oct., 1992.

Copyright (c) 2010 author

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

As to respect GDPR, this site do not allow free registation. Please contact us at:

GDPR Policy:

Please read the statement below:
Processing of personal data and free movement of these data

Registering with this site the author agree with the collection, processing and use of his personal data, exclusively within the ASHUES journal.




To crown and encourage research efforts of the authors, at the end of a year of publishing our journal board will award online the best papers by distinctions:

1. Best Original Paper Award -  for the paper that has brought something completely new in the reader's attention (a new concept, a new trend, a new proposal in research, etc.)

2. Excellence Award - for the most cited paper and visualized in the online environment during the year

3. First, Second and Third Award- for the best documented and substantiated papers during the year

4. Special Award - to award PhD students and postdocs for the most well documented and substantiated paper

Administred:Rocsana B. Manea Tonis