Considerations regarding the general rule provided by the article 4 of the Rome II regulation
Keywords:
choice of law, non-contractual obligations, habitual residence, Lex loci damni, Lex loci delicti comissi, temporal scopeAbstract
This article addresses certain issues related to the enforcement of the Rome II Regulation. The mentioned Regulation was adopted in order to unify, within the European Union, the rules regarding choice of law concerning non-contractual obligations. The application of the Regulation has caused some controversies in jurisprudence, regarding the implications on the national laws and international treaties or conventions. Almost two years after its prescribed date of application, a rigorous analysis of the Regulation’s impact over the case law, both on national and European level is necessary. The purpose of this study is to briefly describe, the research of the two authors regarding the practical effects of the aforementioned Regulation, as well as some judicial problems arisen from its application, mainly relating to the general rule of law, expressed in the fourth Article of the Regulation.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series operates under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, granting authors full copyright of their work without restrictions. This licensing framework ensures that the journal’s content can be shared and adapted non-commercially, provided appropriate credit is given and derivative works are distributed under the same terms.
By adhering to these principles, the journal reaffirms its commitment to promoting high-caliber research and supporting the global exchange of economic knowledge.