Some strategies for improving the accuracy of unemployment rate forcasts in România



This study proposed to evaluate some alternative forecasts for the unemployment rate of Romania made by European Commission and two national institutions: National Commission for Prognosis (NCP) and Institute for Economic Forecasting (IEF). The most accurate predictions on the forecasting horizon 2001-2011 were provided by IEF and the less accurate by NCP. These results were obtained using U1 Theil’s statistic and a new method that has not been used before in literature in this context. The multi-criteria ranking was applied to make a hierarchy of the institutions regarding the accuracy and five important accuracy measures were taken into account at the same time: mean errors, mean squared error, root mean squared error, U1 and U2 statistics of Theil. The combined forecasts of institutions’ predictions are the best strategy to improve the forecasts accuracy. The filtered and smoothed original predictions based on Hodrick-Prescott filter, respectively Holt-Winters technique are a good strategy of improving the accuracy only for NCP expectations. The assessment and improvement of forecasts accuracy have an important contribution in growing the quality of the decisional process.



forecasts, predictions, accuracy, multi-criteria ranking, combined forecasts, Hodrick-Prescott filter, Holt-Winters smoothing exponential technique

Full Text:



Abreu, I., International Organisations’ vs. Private Analysts’ Forecasts: An Evaluation, Banco de Portugal, article available at: enUS/BdP%20Publications%20Research/wp201120.pdf, 2011.

Allan, G., Evaluating the Usefulness of Forecasts of Relative Growth, Strathclyde, “Discussion Papers in Economics”, No. 12-14, 2012.

Armstrong, J.S. and Fildes, R., On the Selection of Error Measures for Comparisons among Forecasting Methods, “Journal of Forecasting”, 14, p. 67-71, 1995.

Bates, J. and Granger, C.W.J., The Combination of Forecasts, “Operations Research Quarterly”, 20(4), 451-468, 1969.

Bratu (Simionescu), Mihaela, Filters or Holt Winters Technique to Improve the Forecasts for USA Inflation Rate?, “Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica”, Vol. 9, issue no. 1/2013 (forthcoming), 2013.

Bratu, M., Strategies to Improve the Accuracy of Macroeconomic Forecasts in USA, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN-10: 3848403196, ISBN-13: 978-3848403196, 2012.

Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R., Comparing Predictive Accuracy, “Journal of Business and Economic Statistics”, 13, p. 253-265, 1995.

Dovern, J. and Weisser, J., Accuracy, Unbiasedness and Efficiency of Professional Macroeconomic Forecasts: An Empirical Comparison for the G7, “International Journal of Forecasting”, 27 (2), p. 452-465, 2011.

Franses, P.H.; McAleer, M. and Legerstee, R., Evaluating Macroeconomic Forecasts: A Concise Review of Some Recent Developments, Working paper/Department of Economics and Finance, University of Canterbury, 2012.

Gorr, W.L., Forecast Accuracy Measures for Exception Reporting Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves, “International Journal of Forecasting”, Volume 25, Issue 1, January-March 2009, p. 48-61, 2009.

Heilemann, U. and Stekler, H., Introduction to the Future of Macroeconomic Forecasting, “International Journal of Forecasting”, 23(2), p. 159-165, 2007.

Ruth, K., Macroeconomic Forecasting in the EMU: Does Disaggregate Modeling Improve Forecast Accuracy?, “Journal of Policy Modelling”, Volume 30, Issue 3, May-June 2008, p. 417-429, 2008.

Copyright (c) 2012 author

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

As to respect GDPR, this site do not allow free registation. Please contact us at:

GDPR Policy:

Please read the statement below:
Processing of personal data and free movement of these data

Registering with this site the author agree with the collection, processing and use of his personal data, exclusively within the ASHUES journal.




To crown and encourage research efforts of the authors, at the end of a year of publishing our journal board will award online the best papers by distinctions:

1. Best Original Paper Award -  for the paper that has brought something completely new in the reader's attention (a new concept, a new trend, a new proposal in research, etc.)

2. Excellence Award - for the most cited paper and visualized in the online environment during the year

3. First, Second and Third Award- for the best documented and substantiated papers during the year

4. Special Award - to award PhD students and postdocs for the most well documented and substantiated paper